From first glance it may seem that capitalism and pop culture
are linked directly and work “side by side” to strive into the mainstream. The
logic is that capitalism is similar to pop culture in core value of free
competition and rewarding those who work the hardest. Simultaneously, the pop
culture sorts out only the most relevant, up-to-date and popular songs, movies,
TV shows and other cultural products, so that to fit the target audience’s
needs. Capitalism implies that the competition among networks, recording labels
and motion pictures companies is transparent and fair. Likewise, capitalism is
an engine that makes pop culture truly massive, as it is massively advertised,
produced and purchased by society. Conversely, the dominant ideas presented in
media are commonly belong to the ruling class for two reasons. First, access to
education and leisure to become immersed into all manifestations of culture is
traditionally privilege of the ruling class, and, second, capitalists uphold
roughly full control by the media sources due to their outright membership or
due to the ownership of the pop culture production/dissemination (art
galleries, satellites, TV stations, print releases, etc.). The example of that
assertion is the biggest American retailer Wal-Mart dictates creative artists
what it will or will not stock. So, the prevailing number of pop culture
products, films, books and art pieces reflect ideas and attitudes of their
creators, members of ruling class, whose output is alternately masking,
promoting and justifying the kind of social from that fulfills their
privileges.
No comments:
Post a Comment